Mary's Gone Crackers vs Triscuit
How do Mary's Gone Crackers and Triscuit compare inside AI answers? Across the latest Famewise run, here is each brand's visibility in ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini — and how often they are named together.
Relative share of voice
Of the 73 mentions across the two brands, Mary's Gone Crackers takes 33% and Triscuit 67%. They are named together in 18 answers.
Category leaderboards
How this is measured
Famewise generates the category-level questions consumers ask AI assistants, then asks them to current OpenAI GPT, Anthropic Claude and Google Gemini models — each question with web search on and off. An extraction model records every brand named in every answer, the position of its first mention, and the sentiment toward it. Brands are ranked by visibility: the share of this category's answers that name them at least once. Share of mentions is a different cut of the same data — each brand's slice of every brand mention in the category. Every number reflects the latest scheduled run.
Frequently asked questions
Is Mary's Gone Crackers or Triscuit more visible in AI answers?
In the latest Famewise run, Mary's Gone Crackers is named in 24 AI answers and Triscuit in 49. Triscuit has the higher share of voice. The two are named together in 18 answers.
How are Mary's Gone Crackers and Triscuit measured?
Famewise asks current OpenAI GPT, Anthropic Claude and Google Gemini models the questions consumers ask in these brands' categories — with and without web search — and records every brand each answer names, its position, and the sentiment toward it.
Is your brand visible in AI answers? Check it free — then track your share of voice run over run.
Check your brand free Sign up