Harmless Harvest vs LMNT

How do Harmless Harvest and LMNT compare inside AI answers? Across the latest Famewise run, here is each brand's visibility in ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini — and how often they are named together.

Harmless Harvest
5answers mention it
#7.8avg position
Positive (+0.62)sentiment
LMNT tracked
51answers mention it
#2.9avg position
Positive (+0.68)sentiment

Relative share of voice

Of the 56 mentions across the two brands, Harmless Harvest takes 9% and LMNT 91%. They are named together in 3 answers.

How this is measured

Famewise generates the category-level questions consumers ask AI assistants, then asks them to current OpenAI GPT, Anthropic Claude and Google Gemini models — each question with web search on and off. An extraction model records every brand named in every answer, the position of its first mention, and the sentiment toward it. Brands are ranked by visibility: the share of this category's answers that name them at least once. Share of mentions is a different cut of the same data — each brand's slice of every brand mention in the category. Every number reflects the latest scheduled run.

Frequently asked questions

Is Harmless Harvest or LMNT more visible in AI answers?

In the latest Famewise run, Harmless Harvest is named in 5 AI answers and LMNT in 51. LMNT has the higher share of voice. The two are named together in 3 answers.

How are Harmless Harvest and LMNT measured?

Famewise asks current OpenAI GPT, Anthropic Claude and Google Gemini models the questions consumers ask in these brands' categories — with and without web search — and records every brand each answer names, its position, and the sentiment toward it.

Is your brand visible in AI answers? Check it free — then track your share of voice run over run.

Check your brand free Sign up