Endangered Species vs Lindt
How do Endangered Species and Lindt compare inside AI answers? Across the latest Famewise run, here is each brand's visibility in ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini — and how often they are named together.
Relative share of voice
Of the 139 mentions across the two brands, Endangered Species takes 26% and Lindt 74%. They are named together in 15 answers.
How this is measured
Famewise generates the category-level questions consumers ask AI assistants, then asks them to current OpenAI GPT, Anthropic Claude and Google Gemini models — each question with web search on and off. An extraction model records every brand named in every answer, the position of its first mention, and the sentiment toward it. Brands are ranked by share of voice: the number of answers that mention them. Every number reflects the latest scheduled run.
Frequently asked questions
Is Endangered Species or Lindt more visible in AI answers?
In the latest Famewise run, Endangered Species is named in 36 AI answers and Lindt in 103. Lindt has the higher share of voice. The two are named together in 15 answers.
How are Endangered Species and Lindt measured?
Famewise asks current OpenAI GPT, Anthropic Claude and Google Gemini models the questions consumers ask in these brands' categories — with and without web search — and records every brand each answer names, its position, and the sentiment toward it.
Track your brand's share of voice in AI answers.
Sign up free