Crunchmaster vs Mary's Gone Crackers
How do Crunchmaster and Mary's Gone Crackers compare inside AI answers? Across the latest Famewise run, here is each brand's visibility in ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini — and how often they are named together.
Relative share of voice
Of the 34 mentions across the two brands, Crunchmaster takes 29% and Mary's Gone Crackers 71%. They are named together in 4 answers.
How this is measured
Famewise generates the category-level questions consumers ask AI assistants, then asks them to current OpenAI GPT, Anthropic Claude and Google Gemini models — each question with web search on and off. An extraction model records every brand named in every answer, the position of its first mention, and the sentiment toward it. Brands are ranked by visibility: the share of this category's answers that name them at least once. Share of mentions is a different cut of the same data — each brand's slice of every brand mention in the category. Every number reflects the latest scheduled run.
Frequently asked questions
Is Crunchmaster or Mary's Gone Crackers more visible in AI answers?
In the latest Famewise run, Crunchmaster is named in 10 AI answers and Mary's Gone Crackers in 24. Mary's Gone Crackers has the higher share of voice. The two are named together in 4 answers.
How are Crunchmaster and Mary's Gone Crackers measured?
Famewise asks current OpenAI GPT, Anthropic Claude and Google Gemini models the questions consumers ask in these brands' categories — with and without web search — and records every brand each answer names, its position, and the sentiment toward it.
Is your brand visible in AI answers? Check it free — then track your share of voice run over run.
Check your brand free Sign up